<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are lambda expressions objects?</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.lambdafaq.org/are-lambda-expressions-objects/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.lambdafaq.org/are-lambda-expressions-objects/</link>
	<description>Your questions answered: all about Lambdas and friends</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:06:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.2.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: naftalin</title>
		<link>https://www.lambdafaq.org/are-lambda-expressions-objects/#comment-12356</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[naftalin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2013 18:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lambdafaq.org/?p=63#comment-12356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the same point as in the comment on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.lambdafaq.org/what-is-the-type-of-a-lambda-expression/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt;.  And yes, lambda expressions may not be legal Java expressions in isolation. But why should that mean that we don&#039;t reason about their properties when they do occur in context and are legal Java expressions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the same point as in the comment on <a href="http://www.lambdafaq.org/what-is-the-type-of-a-lambda-expression/" rel="nofollow">this page</a>.  And yes, lambda expressions may not be legal Java expressions in isolation. But why should that mean that we don&#8217;t reason about their properties when they do occur in context and are legal Java expressions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
